Gay Marriage
A really hot topic these days. For -or- Against?
If your worried about what someone might think or say about you, you better not get too deep into this subject. One way or another, your answer is going to piss off someone. I’m not one who worries about what people think of me so obviously, I’m going to give you my opinion. But before I do, I’d like to remind you that this is my opinion. I am just as entitled to my opinion as you are to yours. And I won’t hold your opinion against you. Just as I expect you will not hold mine against me. Basically it means, ‘to each – his own’. So – Let us begin.
I’m a very logical person and I usually come to my conclusions in systematical, logical way. So let us begin first by understanding exactly what the question is. I prefer to phrase the question as a ‘for’ question. As opposed to an ‘against’ question. Hence, we will ask, “Are you (Am I) for Gay marriage?” That makes it a nice and easy question to answer. right?
Well, not really. In order to answer this question, me or anyone for that matter, first has to quantify what it is that they think of – when they think of marriage. And it’s probably not the same for everyone. Which is probably why the very question is so controversial. We all have different views on what “marriage” is. For some, it might be a strict interpretation of some particular religious view. Others, within the same religion or even the same church, may differ on the degree to which they believe in that interpretation. Multiply these numbers by a given number of religions in general and you have a pretty diverse group of public opinion.
Add in the Legal issue of what marriage does to/for a couple and it’s easy to see why there is no easy solution. Or, is there?
I believe that marriage is a promise that I made to my wife in and under the presence of MY god. Period. That’s it. Nothing more – and nothing less. And here’s a kicker – We don’t even have exactly the same GOD. So her promise is with her GOD, as me to mine. And you know what? It’s going pretty darn good. But let’s pause for a moment and insert a quick sub-question. Has our marriage affected the price of tea in China? Nope. Not one little bit. Truth is – our marriage affects no one but ourselves. (The ‘affects our family – friends argument’ is bullshit. The only thing that changed when we got married was a piece of paper. The relationship was already in place.)
It’s that piece of paper which has the power to affect a change. That piece of paper is a legal document with broad effects. It establishes property rights. It provides a blueprint where one’s assets would transfer, should one die intestate (without a will). It gives legal authority to an individual to make decisions about your welfare or assets should you become incapacitated (living will). But above all else, we must follow that old credo of … follow the money. When you boil it down, that certificate does ONE thing … it lowers the income of the government. (ie: the money they take from us.) That piece of paper means that the taxes the government collects will be reduced because the couple will be seen as “one entity”. If your looking to forecast the future – you need only follow the political tide.
I digress. The point is that I separate “Legal” and ”Moral” in my equations. Legal issues are all the stuff that can be done with a certificate. Whether it is called a “marriage certificate” or “civil union certificate” or whatever. It’s the earthly bound uses of such. Moral issues are how the issue is accepted within the religious community (which is where marriage started anyway) and it’s the “life after death” stuff.
I think that no sound mind would argue that I alone have the right to say who is to take charge of my welfare if I am unable to do so. And if I chose to give that right to another man so be it. I could give it to my father, my brother or even my nephew. And so on for each of us on earth. So legally, the issue is mute. We all have that right. This part of the equation can be fixed by nothing more than “document control”. So now, we get to the hard part, the religious part. As I said earlier, my marriage with my wife is between me – her – and our GODS. Period. It doesn’t matter to you. It doesn’t matter to the IRS. It don’t matter to any other person on this earth and it’s none of your business anyway. Period.
So as far as I’m concerned the solution is really self-evident. Have a ‘Civil Union’ certificate (a single document for everyone) which is used for the legal stuff. Forget the ‘Marriage Certificate’ as any form of legal document. For those already married, grant a 1 year grace period to register for your ‘Civil Union’ certificate (Yes, you could keep your anniversary date). Your “Marriage Certificate”, if you have one or ever intend to get one, is between you, your god and your church. That’s all – and that’s how it was supposed to be anyway. That’s how GOD wanted it. Separate Church and State. So if your one of those that has spent a lot of time trying to make sure that there is a separation between Church and State – Congratulations to you. You got it. Their separate. And you have no right to bitch about it either. And for those of you who think that just because the State accepts you legally, that you have some sort of right to attend any church you want – think again. Any church has the right to accept or reject any person that they feel does not fit with their philosophy. If you don’t like it – go start your own church.
There – I have single handily solved the entire problem. My logic is undeniable.

GREAT Article!! As a gay person/woman, I really enjoyed reading this. I agree with your points and what people do in THEIR own lives is their business and, particularly, in their own bedrooms.
These people who cry that it– “It means a destuction of the family.”– make me ill! A destuction of WHOSE family? Straight people are going to marry the opposite sex and gay people are – not. Also, I can tell you from experience that because someone is married to the opposite sex is does not mean that they are straight. Many gay people get married for a whole host of reasons. I tried it myself when I was in my–”Have to keep other people happy”– phase. People ask me at what age I decided to be gay and I always respond, “Around the same age you decided to be straight.” :-O
Whether I marrry or not, date or not, has no bearing on their lives, at all or as you put it, “On the price of tea in China.”
Telling someone that you do not agree with their sex life is the same as telling someone that you do not agree with the cleaning products they use to clean their bathroom. I never really understood this, from a logical standpoint, it makes no sense. My sex life has nothing to do with who I am as a person, friend or co-worker. People have no idea what goes on in my sex life and I have no idea what goes on in theirs, nor, do I care to. What I am getting at is whether I am sleeping with women at night or with men, that has NO BEARING on their interaction with me and they would not know the difference one way or another, unless, I have mentioned that I am gay, which many people know by this point. I see straight couples that I do not think should be together (ill match, constant fighting, etc. etc.) but you know what? Not my business. These people who say they “do not agree” Who cares? I do not recall anyone asking for their approval on how they like their sex.
When people cry, “That is not the intent of ‘Biblical Marriage’” they are correct-actually, the purpose of “Biblical marriage” is transfer of ownership. In the Bible, women are chattel. Marriage is the contract between the woman’s father and the groom, which is secured by a refundable rebate (dowry). The tradition in which the bride’s father relinquishes ownership before the priest is still practiced as is marking the woman with a collar… now a finger ring. “Husband” then and now retains the meaning of one who cares for chattel (living property).
There are actually scientific studies that know show that those who express their dislike the loudest of homosexuality have the most to hide.
“Is Homophobia Associated With Homosexual Arousal?”
H. E. Adams, L. W. Wright, Jr., and B. A. Lohr
University of Georgia
35 homophobic and 29 nonhomophobic men were exposed to explicit erotic stimuli — heterosexual, male homosexual, and lesbian videotapes, and changes in penile circumference monitored. Both groups showed increases p.c. to heterosexual and lesbain videos. Only homophobic men showed erection to male homosexual stimuli. Homophobia is apparently linked with homosexual arousal.